From fe98041a8126580485592208cf7fceff80cb3fd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Hak Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 05:28:41 +0000 Subject: added question about boot loader git-svn-id: svn://svn.rockbox.org/rockbox/trunk@1130 a1c6a512-1295-4272-9138-f99709370657 --- www/docs/FAQ | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'www') diff --git a/www/docs/FAQ b/www/docs/FAQ index ee30698608..9e72a8fc37 100644 --- a/www/docs/FAQ +++ b/www/docs/FAQ @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Copyright (C) 2002 by Robert E. Hak --------------------------------------------------------------------- +------------------------------------------------------------------- Rockbox FAQ @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ A29: Don't confuse the terms. Reverse engineering means examining a product software without first researching the surrounding interfaces, then no software has ever been written from scratch. -Q30: Wait a minute here. You have release version 1.0, but not a single one +Q30: Wait a minute here. You have released version 1.0, but not a single one of the ideas you have spoken about is actually implimented! Calling this version 1.0 is really misleading. Whats the story?! A30: In simple terms, the first release is called 1.0 because it has a basic @@ -244,3 +244,12 @@ A30: In simple terms, the first release is called 1.0 because it has a basic bring the project some attention, and some additional developers. Adding the missing features is just a matter of time (and that time goes faster if you, yes you, help too). + +Q31: I've heard talk of a 'Rolo'. What is that? (Or 'All you ever wanted + to know about Rockbox boot loaders') +A31: The developers have discussed the possibility of a boot loader. (Mainly + because having one sounds cool, and isn't Rolo just a great name?) + The idea would be that a user could use the load to choose between + different verions of Rockbox or the Archo firmware itself. We do not + have an expected date on this. (As a matter of fact, developement on it + has not even started yet). -- cgit v1.2.3