From 74dd276fe16ecd3de46d866e631273f286fbf7f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Solomon Peachy <pizza@shaftnet.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 21:52:11 -0400
Subject: debug:  Wrap rb_backtrace with HAVE_RB_BACKTRACE instead of CPU_ARM

Basically, preparation for a non-ARM backtrace support.

Change-Id: Icfd09fbc65a98f859e2a19f8d1111827a262a969
---
 firmware/export/system.h | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

(limited to 'firmware/export/system.h')

diff --git a/firmware/export/system.h b/firmware/export/system.h
index f26b3d7f56..ebeef9c004 100644
--- a/firmware/export/system.h
+++ b/firmware/export/system.h
@@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ static inline void cpu_boost_unlock(void)
     #define MIN_STACK_ALIGN 8
 #endif
 
+/* Define this if target has support for generating backtraces */
+#ifdef CPU_ARM
+    #define HAVE_RB_BACKTRACE
+#endif
+
 #ifndef MIN_STACK_ALIGN
 #define MIN_STACK_ALIGN (sizeof (uintptr_t))
 #endif
-- 
cgit v1.2.3