From d68c314cea350df06cd6c664d21628fa4d17d28e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: William Wilgus <wilgus.william@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:18:43 -0400
Subject: [coverity] vuprintf.c format_double_radix() initialize data struct

it appears this is  false positive but its compliaining
about the uninitialized pointer,
 not a bad idea to initialize pointers to NULL anyway

Change-Id: I5832a19ab13971c7d55580694eef70591a3a9acb
---
 firmware/common/vuprintf.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/firmware/common/vuprintf.c b/firmware/common/vuprintf.c
index 0566e3e37e..a040a3f0ac 100644
--- a/firmware/common/vuprintf.c
+++ b/firmware/common/vuprintf.c
@@ -730,7 +730,8 @@ static int format_double_radix(double f,
                                vuprintf_push_cb push,
                                void *userp)
 {
-    struct ap_int ia, fa;
+    struct ap_int ia ={0};
+    struct ap_int fa ={0};
     long rc = parse_double(f, &ia, &fa, fmt_buf);
 
     if (UNLIKELY(rc < 0)) {
-- 
cgit v1.2.3